Incolator
Incolator/Business/Contractor or Employee

Business · 2 min

Contractor or Employee

The hiring debate compares a contractor's scary day rate to an employee's comforting salary — a rate to a wish. This instrument compares the real numbers: the employee's fully loaded year (burden, benefits, overhead, ramp) against the contractor's rate at the utilisation you'll actually buy. The verdict is usually closer than either camp claims.

Currency-agnostic · symbol only Rules version 1.0 Reviewed July 2026

Your details

Σ/ yr
%

Employer taxes, pension, insurance, benefits — the statutory and customary load on top of base.

Σ/ yr

Equipment, software, workspace, admin per head.

%

Leave, training, meetings, internal load — a strong full-timer delivers 75–85% of paid time to the actual work.

Σ
days / yr

The equivalent workload — usually well under a full year, which is half the argument.

Everything is calculated in your browser as you type. Nothing you enter is sent or stored, and no account is needed.

Your result

The contractor, at this workload.

0.82×

contractor cost against the loaded employee year, at these hours

Two ways to buy the work

The employeeThe contractor
Headline figure
True annual cost
Cost per productive day
The year's difference

Three workloads, same choice

If the work is reallyContractor / yrvs loaded employee

What moves this result

Worth checking

The crossover is workload: contractors win partial years and spikes; employees win steady full loads. The days input is doing most of this page's work — be honest about it.

Misclassification is a legal line, not a spreadsheet cell. A contractor who works like an employee is an employee in most jurisdictions, with back-taxes attached; the arithmetic here assumes the structure is legitimate.

Knowledge walks out with the contractor and compounds in the employee — a term with no cell in this table that decides more hires than the table does.

Common questions

Is a contractor more expensive than an employee?
Compare loaded cost to actual days, not rate to salary. A $110,000 employee at 28% burden plus $9,000 overhead costs about $149,800 a year — roughly $815 per productive day. A $720/day contractor for 170 days is $122,400. At full-year workloads the employee usually wins; at partial ones, the contractor.
What does an employee really cost per day?
Loaded cost divided by productive days: salary plus burden and seat overhead, over roughly 230 working days times the productive share (75–85%). The $478/day a $110,000 salary suggests becomes about $815 once counted honestly — which is why contractor rates only look outrageous next to the wrong number.
When does hiring beat contracting?
When the workload is steady and full, the knowledge should compound in-house, and the horizon is years: the loaded employee then buys more productive days per euro. Spikes, specialties and partial-year needs price the other way. The instrument's days input finds your crossover exactly.
How this is calculated

Everything below is calculated from your inputs. Nothing is fetched, nothing is looked up.

employee = salary × (1 + burden) + overhead per_day = employee / (230 × productive_share) contractor = day_rate × days_bought gauge = contractor / employee

The gauge reads the contractor's annual cost against the loaded employee year, parity at 1.0. The per-productive-day line is the honest unit: a $110,000 salary is not $478 a day once burden, overhead and the productive share are counted — it is usually within sight of the contractor rate that looked outrageous.

Limitations. Ramp time, management load, agency margins and jurisdictional classification rules all move the figure; equity and retention risk sit outside. The instrument prices the year — the relationship is your desk's work.